Grundgesetze, as mentioned, was to be Frege’s magnum opus. It was to provide rigorous, gapless proofs that arithmetic was just logic further. Gottlob Frege’s Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, or Basic Laws of Arithmetic, was intended to be his magnum opus, the book in which he would. Gottlob Frege’s Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, or Basic Laws of Arithmetic, was intended to be his magnum opus, the book in which he would finally establish his .

Author: Nitaur Gardanos
Country: Sri Lanka
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Relationship
Published (Last): 3 September 2010
Pages: 195
PDF File Size: 2.74 Mb
ePub File Size: 8.9 Mb
ISBN: 765-3-59883-747-2
Downloads: 95484
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Karamar

John believes that Samuel Clemens wrote Huckleberry Finn. Philosophy of Languagep. His ideas spread chiefly through those he influenced, such as Russell, Wittgenstein, and Carnap, and through work on logic and semantics by Polish logicians. University of California Press, v—lvii Goldfarb, W. In order to find a definition of numbers as objectsFrege treats them instead as value-ranges of value-ranges.

Frege took advantage of his second-order language to define what it is for an object to be a member of an extension or set. Creative definitions fail to be conservative, as this freg explained above.

Gottlob Frege

For more information, see the drege on ” Russell’s Paradox “. While “identity”, as Frege uses the term, is a relation holding only between objects, Frege believes that there is a relation similar to identity that holds between functions just in case they always share the same value for every argument. From these simple terms, one can define the formulas of the language as follows: Though largely ignored during his lifetime, Giuseppe Peano — and Bertrand Russell — introduced his work to later generations of logicians and philosophers.


This is not quite right and, moreover, potentially problematic. But now what about the concept extension which is not an element of itself? Translated as “Function and Concept. Kneale, William and Martha Kneale. But despite appearances, there is no circularity, since Fregd analyzes the second-order concept being a concept under which two objects fall without appealing to the concept two.

Such contexts can be referred to as “oblique contexts”, contexts in which the reference of an expression is shifted from grundgdsetze customary reference to its customary sense.

Here is what Frege says:. According to the old conception, length appears as something material crege fills the straight line between its end points and at the same time prevents another thing from penetrating into its space by its rigidity. Frege had a heavy teaching load during his first few years at Jena. Logical axioms are true because they express true frge about these entities. But this conception has not yet been articulated in a widely accepted way, and so elements common to Frege’s and Kant’s conception may yet play a role in our understanding of what logic is.

Here we can see the connection with the understanding of number expressions as being statements about concepts.

But the sense of the word “Wales” is a part of the sense of the latter expression, but no part of the sense of the “full name” of Prince Charles. Nevertheless, his definitions e. MacFarlane goes on to point out that Frege’s logic also contains higher-order quantifiers i. Also note the lurking regress if we ask for an explanation of the phrase grundhesetze concept F ‘ occurring in ‘the extension of the concept F ‘. Frege then demonstrated that one could use his system to resolve theoretical mathematical statements in terms of simpler grunndgesetze and mathematical notions.


Reading Frege’s Grundgesetze – Hardcover – Richard G. Heck, Jr. – Oxford University Press

This is quite unobjectionable, especially since its earlier intuitive character was at bottom mere appearance. In other words, Frege subscribed to logicism. Furth translator and editorBerkeley: This insight, however, led to another. The contradiction now goes as follows. While Frege’s logical language represented a kind of formal grundgfsetze, he insisted that his formal system was important only because of what its signs represent and its propositions mean.

Indeed, the natural numbers are precisely the finite cardinals.

Gottlob Frege (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

He put this to use in the Grundgesetze to define the natural numbers. Views Read Edit View history.

Contributions to Logic Trained as a mathematician, Frege’s interests in logic grew out of his interests in the foundations of arithmetic. In grundgessetze, extensions can be rehabilitated in various ways, either axiomatically as in modern set theory which appears to be consistent or as in various consistent reconstructions of Frege’s system. Translated by Hans Kaal.