AMEER MUAWIYA AUR TAREEKHI HAQAIQ PDF
Hazrat Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq By Shaykh Mufti Taqi Usmani A FAMOUS BOOK WRITTEN IN DEFENCE OF HAZRAT MUAVIA [R.A] Hazrat Ameer Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Rivayaat By Shaykh Muhammad. Ameer Muawiya Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq Author Mufti Taqi Usmani. May Click to Download Click to Read on Scribd. Post a Comment. For More Islamic Books For More Islamic Books Visit For More I.
|Country:||Republic of Macedonia|
|Published (Last):||2 November 2005|
|PDF File Size:||6.18 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.95 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Hazrat Ameer Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Rivayaat By Shaykh Muhammad Saqib Risalpuri
Nobody engages in a revolt with a handful of companions including his family members and young children. If someone blames our father, should we accept his accusations without any assessment?
My objective of providing you with the book was to demonstrate that two points of view exist on this issue and both groups have their own arguments based on the reports compiled by Imam Tabari.
We should not accept all incidents reported to us by historians without such evaluation. However, information available through Tawatur is something different and exceptional.
On the other side, if we keep a bad opinion about the companions and they were free from such accusations, Allah will definitely hold us accountable. We should keep a good view Husn Zann about all the companions and leave the matter of their internal disputes of Allah. My point is that if you want to quote an example it should be a good example. Recently, a group of Arab scholars named BarzanjiHallaqZia al- U’mri and Khalil have conducted that evaluation and found that large number of reports in this book are fake.
The length of ruling period is not a sign of patients. I hope you ll not think that I am a Shia because ‘I am not’. I hope you get my point. Since the matter is grave, we should evaluate the authenticity of the events reported by the history. All those who accepted their caliphate will also be charged automatically as they accepted corrupt rulers.
Hazrat Muavia r.a Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq By Shaykh Mufti Taqi Usmani
I even extend this to all other people and do not accuse anyone for any charge against him and leave their matter to Allah. If we accept the narrations portraying himself as a dictator, the matter will not remain limited to tarreekhi. I agree with you that narrations from such people should not be accepted muuawiya other matters even it is in favor of our view.
Nobody believes that Sahaba were free from sin. We cannot say about a theory that “it definitely has happened. We know that some people are biased towards Hazrat Abu BakrU’mar.
You know that a theory means, “it might have happened “. A riwaiat is not authentic because the rawi is shia and the same time another riwaiat by a shia rawi is authentic because it favours his opinion Therefore, the taeekhi becomes extremely grave.
The book is available at the following links: Thank you very much for answering me. We are free to form opinions within this life. Regards Respected Sister Wa alaikum us salam wa Rahmatullah The views presented in the books belong to their authors and they ameed responsible for providing the answer raised on their work. In the first century, even it was not possible to distinguish people as the dispute was only political and not religious.
Taredkhi will be highly appreciated. Search the Website New.
Therefore, there is no charge of revolt against him. It is very logical. Respected Tarekehi Assalam o alaikum wa Rahmatullah Many thanks for your kind words and comments about my books. He only compiled the traditions and did not perform evaluation of such reports.
If you tarreekhi Arabic, you should study the history from its original source. I repeat the names: Why should we rely on secondary sources? If a matter with such doubtful information is presented to any court in the world, the judge will not be able to decide the matter and will acquit the suspect based on the benefit of doubt despite of the fact that the suspect and relevant witnesses are available in his court.
Details of this procedure are available here: Tabari is available on the following link. I’ll advise you to study that procedure and apply that on the original source of all historical narrations compiled by Tabari. We also know that all such people disguised themselves in mainstream Muslims.
When the matter is only an issue of doubtful reports, why should we form our opinions based on them.
He will decide this issue on the Day of Judgment. I hope this will clarify haqakq position on that. Don’t hesitate to share your questions and comments. All other tareeihi books of subsequent periods were written based on Tabari’s work. You can download and see through the chapters related to the years ranging from 30 to 65H. Since you’ve mentioned that you are not a ShiaI’ll urge you to study it with an open mind and analyze its content critically.
Hazrat Ameer Muawiyah Radi Allahu Anhu | Urdu Islamic Books PDF Download for free Online Library
So why should we accept narrations from such people who portray a bad picture of such personalities? Please see at least the Unit 1 of this book. Other than that, there is nothing except theories of different people. There is a discipline in the historical studies that deals with criticism on xmeer events.